Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 26, 1974PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TODD, Judge.

The petitioner-condemnor, The Nashville Housing Authority, whose name has now been changed to “Metropolitan Housing and Development Agency,” has appealed from a non-jury judgment awarding to respondents-owners, Horace G. Hill, Jr., and Third National Bank, Co-Trustees, the sum of $61,458.00 plus interest of $14,193.44 for the taking of respondent’s property by eminent domain.

The other respondent, Southern Finishers, Inc., former tenant on the condemned premises, was awarded damages for moving expenses in a former trial, and was denied further damages in the present…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Kentucky Hydro-Electric Co. v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. New Jersey Zinc Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. County of Cook v. MalysaIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Lewisburg & N. R. v. HindsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Citizens Bank of BatesvilleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  2. McGill v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Adams v. MellenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  4. Lyon v. Ford Motor CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Henry v. HenryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API