Legal Opinion
Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. Dennis
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 13, 1924No. Civ. No. 2751PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
This is a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal from that part of the judgment herein which fixes defendants’ damages for the taking of their property for a public use.
The defendants are the owners of certain lands riparian to Pitt River. Fall River empties into Pitt River above these lands. Having determined to divert all of the water naturally flowing in Fall River to its hydro-electric power plant and thence convey the water to Pitt River at a point below defendant’s lands, this proceeding was commenced for the purpose of condemning defendants’ riparian rights in so far as the waters to be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern Railroad v. AubuchonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Steinhart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. BolesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railroad v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Madisonville H. & E. R. R. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- County of Cook v. MalysaIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- State ex rel. Morrison v. Jay Six Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Regents of University of California v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.