Legal Opinion

Fraternal Order of Eagles, Inc. v. City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 29, 1991No. 2 CA-CV 90-0237PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Chief Judge.

The Fraternal Order of Eagles, Inc., Tucson Aerie # 180 (F.O.E.) appeals from the trial court’s affirmance of the City of Tucson administrative hearing officer’s ruling that the F.O.E. is required to admit four women to membership and is subject to a $1,000 fine for violating a city ordinance against discrimination. We agree that the F.O.E. is subject to the ordinance and affirm.

The F.O.E. began in the State of Washington in the 1890’s and the Tucson unit or aerie began in 1901. It describes itself as a fraternal organization. Its articles of incorporation state…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Board of Directors of Rotary International v. Rotary Club of DuarteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. State v. Superior Court for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Richter v. Dairy Queen of Southern Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Morrison v. Jay Six Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Human Rights Commission v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. Seabourn v. Coronado Area CouncilSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Brush & Nib v. PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Gilmore v. GallegoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API