Legal Opinion

Utica Mutual Insurance v. Miller

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 2, 2000No. 6709, September Term, 1998PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

We must decide in this appeal whether Utica Mutual Insurance Company, appellant, has a duty to defend William Ray Miller II, appellee, in a tort action. Appellant denied coverage, contending that under the terms of an errors and omissions insurance policy issued to appellee’s employer, it has no duty to defend appellee because the underlying case against appellee asserts claims that are expressly barred from coverage. Appellee subsequently filed a suit for declaratory relief in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County seeking, inter alia, a declaration that appellant has a duty to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Sullins v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. K. Bell & Associates, Inc. v. Lloyd's UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Hartford Insurance v. Manor Inn of Bethesda, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. CNA InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. LoweCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Westport Insurance v. Black, Davis & Shue Agency, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Nautilus Insurance v. BSA Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API