Legal Opinion

Hartford Insurance v. Manor Inn of Bethesda, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 9, 1994No. 28, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Judge.

The issue this case presents involves causation, proximate and superseding. This case arose when an escaped patient from a State-operated hospital for the mentally ill stole a van that had been left unattended, with the keys in the ignition, and, while driving the van, subsequently struck another automobile, causing personal injury and property damage. The injured driver, Robert Wewer (“Wewer”), having been com pensated for his injuries, pursuant to an existing insurance policy, his carrier, The Hartford Insurance Company, the petitioner, sued the State of Maryland (“the State”)…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. County Commissioners v. J. Roland Dashiell & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Valentine v. on Target, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API