Legal Opinion
Hoskins v. Napolitano
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 31, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-2061 (RWR)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff James F. Hoskins brings this action against the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), and the United States Coast Guard (“USCG”), alleging claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. 1346(b)(1), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. The defendants have moved to dismiss for improper venue, or, in the alternative, to transfer the case to the District of Maryland. Because venue is improper…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- John Sinclair v. Richard G. KleindienstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Darby v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Lewis v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Emmett J. Stebbins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Nationwide Mutual Iinsurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Keystone Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pilling v. AustinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Pilling v. AustinDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
- Walton v. ReganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025