Legal Opinion

Pilling v. Austin

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 26, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2024-0259Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STACEY PILLING, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-cv-259 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, as U.S. Secretary of Defense and PETER FOREMAN, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff, Stacey Pilling, sued her employer, Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, and a colleague, Peter Foreman, (collectively “defendants”) for Title VII and tort violations. Compl. at 18-25, ECF No. 2. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue. Defs.’ Mot. Dismiss or Transfer Venue (“Defs.’…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API