Pilling v. Austin
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STACEY PILLING, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-cv-259 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, as U.S. Secretary of Defense and PETER FOREMAN, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff, Stacey Pilling, sued her employer, Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, and a colleague, Peter Foreman, (collectively “defendants”) for Title VII and tort violations. Compl. at 18-25, ECF No. 2. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue. Defs.’ Mot. Dismiss or Transfer Venue (“Defs.’…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.