Legal Opinion

Pilling v. Austin

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided November 26, 2024No. 1:24-cv-01293Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STACEY PILLING, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-cv-259 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, as U.S. Secretary of Defense and PETER FOREMAN, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff, Stacey Pilling, sued her employer, Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, and a colleague, Peter Foreman, (collectively “defendants”) for Title VII and tort violations. Compl. at 18-25, ECF No. 2. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue. Defs.’ Mot. Dismiss or Transfer Venue (“Defs.’…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API