Mize v. Harvey Shapiro Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIDSON, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on the defendants’ motions to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. The moving defendants argue that the plaintiff is unable to establish the elements of its claim and that the court cannot hear the claims because of a bar by the statute of limitations and the lack of in ■personam jurisdiction. After considering the motion, briefs, relevant authorities, and the record as a whole, the court is of the opinion that the defendants’ motion is well taken.
I
Factual Background
Plaintiff Marie Mize (“Mize”) brought…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tichenor v. Roman Catholic Church of Archdiocese of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- McCorkle v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001
- Lane v. Strang Communications Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2003
- Hervey v. MetLife General Insurance Corp. System Agency of Mississippi, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Lofton v. Turbine Design, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.