Legal Opinion
Lofton v. Turbine Design, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided March 29, 2000No. CIV.A.3:99CV084-B-A, 3:99CV085-B-A, 3:99CV086-B-A, 2:99CV213-B-APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BIGGERS, District Judge.
These causes come before the court upon the defendants’ motions to dismiss and supplemental motions to dismiss. Upon due consideration of the parties’ memoranda and responses thereto, the court is ready to rule.
FACTS
The plaintiffs, Lofton, Lamb and Lee, are three of the four original shareholders of Phoenix Corporation, a Mississippi corporation, which is primarily in the business of converting aircraft according to various engine applications. 1 Phoenix also designs and develops said applications. Phoenix has its registered office at the airport in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Internet Doorway, Inc. v. ParksDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Burleson v. TobackDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Medinah Mining, Inc. v. AmunateguiDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2002
- Nicholas Services, LLC v. Bombardier Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2023
- SPRP, LLC v. WolfeDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.