State v. Fontanez
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The defendant, Carlos Fontanez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a conditional plea of nolo contendere pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a, for possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a). He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a roadside inventory search of the vehicle in which he was traveling. We find the record is inadequate to allow review of this claim and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The defendant’s motion to suppress was denied in an oral decision of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. RosedomConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. LawlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WilsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. AriscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Von Kohorn v. Von KohornConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011