Legal Opinion

State v. Arisco

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 29, 1995No. 13354PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to dismiss the charge against him because he was stopped by the police in violation of article first, §§ 7 and 9, of the constitution of Connecticut, and (2) denied his application for participation in a pretrial alcohol education program. We are unpersuaded by the defendant’s claims…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. State v. RosedomConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. State v. YoudinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. State v. MarquisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. State v. FontanezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DiNapoli v. CookeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Middletown Commercial Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. State v. BeliveauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. State v. DipaoloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Primary Construction Services, LLC v. North American Specialty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API