Legal Opinion

Morrell v. Rice

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 29, 1993PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

Defendants James and Rita Rice appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Alexander, J.) following a nonjury trial. They contend that the court’s determination that the plaintiffs, Robert and Nancy Morrell, have an easement by necessity over their land was error because there was no unity of title at the time the easement was found to have been created and because the Mor-rells’ land was and is accessible by land and from the sea. The Rices also contend that the court erred in giving the Morrells the right to install utility lines underground…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad v. YarianIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  2. LeMay v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Traders, Inc. v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. Frederick v. Consolidated Waste Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  5. Attaway v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. PARC Holdings, Inc. v. KillianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Richards v. Land Star Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  3. Anchors v. ManterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. Stroda v. Joice Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Amodeo v. FrancisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API