Legal Opinion

PARC Holdings, Inc. v. Killian

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 2001PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrie Melvin, J.

¶ 1 Appellants, Paul J. Killian and Bonita F. Killian, (the Killians), appeal from the final determination in this declaratory judgment action, which granted Appellee, PARC Holdings, Inc. t/a PARC Development, L.P. (PARC), the right to install utilities within the boundaries of an express easement. Specifically, the trial court ruled that the language of the easement or right of way was not limited to physical ingress and egress as alleged by the Killians but extended to the installment of utilities. For the reasons that follow, we affirm this ruling.

¶2 The facts and procedural history may be…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Merrill v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Fleming v. Napili Kai, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Dowgiel v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Lease v. DollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Pressley v. Travelers Property Casualty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Amerikohl Mining Co. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. McNAUGHTON PROPERTIES, LP v. BarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Forest Glen Condominium Ass'n v. Forest Green Commons Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Kapp v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API