Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Gustafson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1988No. S-1603PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Robert J. Sparks, Jr., executor of his father’s estate (Estate), appeals from a superior court decision ordering the Estate to pay $65,706.07 to the plaintiff, Ernie Gus-tafson, in compensation for management services that Gustafson rendered to the Estate and for maintaining and improving Estate property. The central issue presented here is whether it is unjust to allow the Estate to retain these benefits without paying for them. In particular, Sparks argues that Gustafson gave his services to the Estate gratuitously, without the Estate’s knowledge or consent.

FACTS…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Williams v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. PearsonArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Siggelkow v. SiggelkowAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bevins v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. 4934, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Jordan Keys & Jessamy, LLP v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Crittell v. BingoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API