Legal Opinion

Young v. City of Seagoville

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1967No. 16981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Justice.

Appellant T. L. Young has appealed from a judgment against him in a suit whereby he sought to enjoin appellee City of Seago-ville, Texas from enforcing the provisions of the City’s Ordinance No. 132. The ordinance among other things provides that a pool parlor may be operated in Seagoville upon payment to the City of an annual license fee of $10.00.

Appellant owns and prior to February 24, 1967 maintained in use within the City of Seagoville three coin-operated billiard tables on which he has paid the 1967 state annual occupation tax of $5.00 on each table as required by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. City of Wink v. Griffith Amusement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State v. Ferguson KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Prescott v. City of BorgerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Addison v. Dallas Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. City of Lockhart v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
  4. North Carolina Electric Membership Corp. v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API