State v. Morales
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCornyn, Justice
in which GONZALEZ, HIGHTOWER, HECHT and ENOCH, Justices join.
Equity jurisdiction does not flow merely from the alleged inadequacy of a remedy at law, nor can it originate solely from a court’s good inteñtions to do what seems “just” or “right;” the jurisdiction of Texas courts — the very authority to decide eases — is conferred solely by the constitution and the statutes of the state. 1
In this state’s bifurcated system of civil and criminal jurisdiction, a civil court has jurisdiction to declare constitutionally invalid and enjoin the enforcement of a criminal statute only when (1) there is…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Camp v. ShannonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by339 opinions
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. HeinrichTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Frost National Bank v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 2010
334 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.