Legal Opinion

State v. Morales

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1994No. D-2393PublishedCited by 339 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCornyn, Justice

in which GONZALEZ, HIGHTOWER, HECHT and ENOCH, Justices join.

Equity jurisdiction does not flow merely from the alleged inadequacy of a remedy at law, nor can it originate solely from a court’s good inteñtions to do what seems “just” or “right;” the jurisdiction of Texas courts — the very authority to decide eases — is conferred solely by the constitution and the statutes of the state. 1

In this state’s bifurcated system of civil and criminal jurisdiction, a civil court has jurisdiction to declare constitutionally invalid and enjoin the enforcement of a criminal statute only when (1) there is…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Camp v. ShannonTexas Supreme Court · 1961

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by339 opinions

  1. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. HeinrichTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Frost National Bank v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 2010

334 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API