Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided May 9, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Harvey Hilderbran Chair, Committee on State Cultural and Recreational Resources Texas House of Representatives P.O. Box 2910 Austin, Texas 78768-2910

Re: Validity of ethics ordinance provisions proposed for adoption by the City of Seguin (RQ-0626-JC)

Dear Representative Hilderbran:

Your predecessor as Chair of the House Committee on State Recreational Resources asked whether two ethics ordinance provisions proposed by the City of Seguin are legally prohibited. Seguin is a home-rule city with a city manager form of government overseen by a nine-member city council.1

Nonprofit Board…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Lower Colorado River Authority v. City of San MarcosTexas Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API