Legal Opinion

City of Wink v. Griffith Amusement Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1936No. 6899PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice

Cureton delivered the opinion of the Court.

The full statement of the case in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals (78 S. W. (2d) 1065) will suffice for the purposes of this opinion.

The Griffith Amusement Company, a corporation, was engaged in operating a moving picture theatre in the City of Wink, in Winkler County. One day in each week it conducted what it designated as “Bank Night.” What the “Bank Night” feature was and how it was operated, and the result thereof, is stated in defendant in error’s petition in the following language:

“Plaintiff alleges that for several…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Featherstone v. Independent Service Station Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. State v. . LipkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Randle v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  4. State v. RandleTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  5. El Paso Electric Co. v. CollinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Truly v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  5. State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API