Legal Opinion

MacPherson v. Department of Administrative Services

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2006No. CC 05C10444; SC S52875PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

In this case, we are required to determine the constitutionality of Ballot Measure 37 (2004), a statutory enactment that the people approved at the 2004 General Election. The measure requires government to either compensate landowners for reductions of real property fair market value due to certain “land use regulation [s]” or modify, remove, or not apply such regulations. Plaintiffs filed the present declaratory judgment action in circuit court pursuant to ORS 28.020 and ORS 250.044, 3 seeking to invalidate Measure 37 on various state and federal constitutional grounds. The trial court…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Bowers v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. SpeedisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Meyer v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API