Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. McKloskey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2009No. 2007AP2135-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review a report and recommendation filed by the referee, Stanley F. Hack, recommending this court suspend Attorney Neil R. McKloskey's license to practice law for 60 days and impose the costs of this disciplinary proceeding on him. No appeal has been filed, so the court considers this matter pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).1

¶ 2. We adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law. We agree that Attorney McKloskey's *604misconduct warrants the suspension of his license to practice law in Wisconsin for a period of 60 days. We also impose the costs of this proceeding on Attorney…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burkes v. HalesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against ArthurWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GibsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. McNeelyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard W. VossWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST NEIL R. v. McKLOSKEYWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard W. VossWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API