Office of Lawyer Regulation v. McNeely
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review the recommendation of the referee, Dennis Flynn, that the license of Attorney R. L. McNeely to practice law in this state be suspended for a period of 60 days for professional misconduct. Neither party appealed the referee's report, so this matter is submitted to the court for review pursuant to SCR 22.17(2). We also consider Attorney McNeely's objection to the costs of this proceeding.
¶ 2. We conclude that the referee's findings of fact are supported by satisfactory and convincing evidence. We agree that the seriousness of Attorney McNeely's misconduct warrants the suspension…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against SosnayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against BerlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
3Cited by8 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Kenyatta RileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- In THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST McNEELYWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- In re Complaint as to the Conduct of GattiOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. McKloskeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- In THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST NEIL R. v. McKLOSKEYWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.