Legal Opinion
Semerdjian v. McDougal Littell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 22, 2009No. 07 Civ. 7496 (LMM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McKENNA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hilda Semerdjian (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Defendants McDougal Littell (“McDougal”), a division of Houghton Mifflin Company, and R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (“Donnelley”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging copyright infringement. Defendants move for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the issue of disgorgement of Defendants’ profits under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 504(b). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED, in part, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bergt v. McDOUGAL LITTELLDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill CompaniesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Graham v. PrinceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Rivera v. Méndez & CompañiaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
- SNMP Research, Inc. v. Broadcom Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.