Legal Opinion

MM Resources, Inc. v. Huston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 1985No. 61240PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

MM Resources, Inc. (appellant) filed a petition against A.L. Huston (appellee) in the District Court of Garfield County, seeking money damages in the amount of $43,-781.28 plus interest, attorney’s fees and costs. Appellant’s complaint is based on an alleged oral agreement whereby appellant agreed to pay appellee’s proportionate share of drilling expenses on a leasehold and receive all billings from the operator on behalf of appellee. In return, appellee allegedly agreed to pay appellant directly for his proportionate share of drilling expenses as they became due. After making…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Durham v. SharumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Dickson v. DicksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leck v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Samson Resources Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Union Texas Petroleum Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Leede Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Ghk Exploration Company, an Oklahoma Partnership v. Tenneco Oil Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API