Ghk Exploration Company, an Oklahoma Partnership v. Tenneco Oil Company, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.8. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The determinative issue presented in this appeal is whether the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (Commission) or the district court has subject-matter jurisdiction to resolve whether certain correspondence between parties to a forced-pooling order constitutes a valid election to participate under the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Amarex, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Woods Petroleum Corp. v. SledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Nilsen v. Ports of Call Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brumark Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Marshall v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Ghk Exploration Company, an Oklahoma Partnership v. Tenneco Oil Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Centurion Oil, Inc. v. Stephens Production Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.