Legal Opinion
Leck v. Continental Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 28, 1989No. 72054PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice:
Certified Question of Law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
The appellants are mineral rights owners in Section 21, T13 N, RIO W, Canadian County, Oklahoma. This section was spaced for 640-aere drilling and spacing units for the Atoka-Morrow formation along with the adjacent Section 20, T13 N, RIO W, Canadian County in 1967 pursuant to Order No. 66858 of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (commission). In 1972, the sections were pooled and the leasehold interests in the minerals were adjudicated with appellee being designated the operator in both…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Morriss v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Nilsen v. Ports of Call Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Hall Jones Oil Corporation v. ClaroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Brumark Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Howell v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Krug v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Fransen v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.