Legal Opinion
A. J. Brown & Son, Inc. v. City of Grand Rapids
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1933No. Docket No. 117, Calendar No. 37,405PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.
The judgment for defendants should be affirmed.
The testimony shows that in the year 1894 a new lateral water main on Ionia avenue, in the city of Grand Rapids, Michigan, was connected with a large main owned and operated by the Grand Rapids Hydraulic Company, with the object of supplying water to the building thereafter acquired by defendant George L. Young Company and occupied by defendant Bishop Furniture Company. The evidence revealed that no change whatsoever has ever been made in the pipes or elbows o'f the lateral main since their installation. The city of Grand Rapids acquired the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Monat v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Philadelphia Ritz Carlton Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Jenney v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Kerr v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Weaver v. Motor Transit Management Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Lubin v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- City of Richmond v. Hood Rubber Products Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Grace & Co. (Pacific Coast), a Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.