Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Ritz Carlton Co. v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1925No. Appeal, 208PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

In 1901, the City of Philadelphia constructed a high-pressure main for fire purposes, placing the same in part on Walnut Street. It was not connected in any way with the pipes supplying water for ordinary uses. As originally built, it was under the sidewalk in front of the property now occupied by the Ritz Carlton Hotel Company, plaintiff here, but, in 1914, was removed to the north of the curb line, extending to Broad Street, so that the space formerly used might be included in the basements of the new building. The pipe was laid in newly made ground adjoining…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Titus v. Bradford etc. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, McKean County1890
  2. Herron v. PittsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Travers v. Delaware CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Kilbride v. Carbon Dioxide & Magnesia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Childs v. County of CrawfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Greco v. 7-Up Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Kehres v. StuempfleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Lentz v. Allentown Bobbin WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API