Legal Opinion

Paul v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 30, 2011No. AC 31490PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALVORD, J.

The defendant, the Fairfield plan and zoning commission (commission), appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal of the plaintiff, Nicole Paul, from the commission’s denial of her subdivision application. On appeal, the commission claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that the evidence was insufficient to support the commission’s determination that the plaintiff’s proposed subdivision road was a “cul-de-sac” as defined in § 2.1.6 of the Fairfield subdivision regulations (regulations) and (2) concluded that the commission’s requirement for an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Florian v. LengeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Northeast Parking, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. Heithaus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Municipal Funding, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Trumbull Falls, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cockerham v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API