Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Kasich

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2012No. 2012-0019PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an original action in which relators, 36 electors living in various districts for the Ohio House of Representatives as reapportioned by the Ohio Apportionment Board on September 30, 2011, seek declaratory and injunctive relief. They seek declaratory and injunctive relief against respondents, the four Republican members of the five-member Ohio Apportionment Board — a declaration that the apportionment plan adopted by the board is invalid because the board failed to comply with Article XI of the Ohio Constitution, which governs the decennial apportionment of districts in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Blankenship v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Becker v. City of EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Commt. for the Referendum of Lorain Ordinance No. 77-01 v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Becker v. EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. KasichOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
  3. In Re Contest of Election Held on Stark County Issue 6Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Wilson v. KasichOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API