Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Kasich

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2012No. 2012-0019PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Wilson v. Kasich, 134 Ohio St.3d 221,

2012-Ohio-5367.] WILSON ET AL. v. KASICH, GOVERNOR, ET AL. [Cite as Wilson v. Kasich, 134 Ohio St.3d 221,

2012-Ohio-5367.] Apportionment—The Ohio Constitution does not mandate political neutrality in the reapportionment of house and senate districts—Partisan considerations cannot prevail over the nonpartisan requirements set forth in Article XI—One challenging the constitutionality of an apportionment plan must establish that the plan is unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt—The Ohio Constitution, Article XI, Section 7(D) is coequal with…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Davis v. BandemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Summerville v. City of Forest ParkOhio Supreme Court · 2010

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Ohio Redistricting Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Ohio Redistricting Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API