Legal Opinion

Maui Land & Pineapple Co. v. Infiesto

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1994No. 17126PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIL, Justice.

In this action to quiet title, Defendants-Appellants Josephine Naukana Infíesto (In-fiesto) and Marvlee K. Naukana-Gilding (Naukana-Gilding) (collectively Defendants) appeal from the circuit court’s order granting partial summary judgment and denying their motion for reconsideration in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLPC).

Defendants contend that: (1) the circuit court considered inadmissible hearsay evidence in granting MLPC’s motion for partial summary judgment; (2) the circuit court erred in denying Defendants’ motion for reconsideration in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. ROHNER ET UX v. NevilleOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Shilts v. YoungAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Apo v. Dillingham Investment CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Harrison v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bremer v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Omerod v. Heirs of KaheananuiHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Menashe v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  4. Dias v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
  5. Ka'upulehu Land LLC v. Heirs and Assigns of PahukulaHawaii Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API