Haas v. Kasnot

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

This is the second time that these cases have been appealed to this court by the plaintiffs. On the first appeal, reported in 371 Fa. 580, 92 A.2d 171, we held that legally inadmissible testimony had been introduced at the trial; therefore we reversed the judgments that had been entered on the jury’s verdicts for defendant and granted plaintiffs a new trial. The jury has now again found a verdict in defendant’s favor.

Plaintiffs’ present complaints, which relate principally to alleged errors of commission and omission in the trial judge’s charge to the…