Dentsply International, Inc. v. Benton
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
Invoking our diversity jurisdiction, the plaintiffs, Dentsply International, Inc. and Tulsa Dental Products Inc. (Tulsa), Dents-ply’s wholly owned subsidiary, filed a complaint against the defendant, Brett C. Benton, a former employee of Tulsa. (We will refer to the plaintiffs collectively as “Dents-ply” or the “plaintiff.”) Dentsply seeks damages and injunctive relief for breach of an employment contract allegedly consisting of solicitation of Dentsply’s customers and use of Dentsply’s confidential information.
We are considering the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roberson v. Cityscape Corp. (In Re Roberson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- United Rentals, Inc. v. PruettDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Strong v. Option One Mortgage Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Babn Technologies Corp. v. BrunoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. EdwardsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.