Legal Opinion
Strong v. Option One Mortgage Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 31, 2004No. 19-10902PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE FOX, Bankruptcy Judge.
The above-captioned chapter 13 debtors, Albert and Deborah Strong, have filed an adversary proceeding against Option One Mortgage Corporation d/b/a H & R Block Mortgage (“Option One”). The plaintiffs claim that a loan transaction they entered into with this defendant in May 1999 violated the federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA), the federal Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), Pennsylvania’s Act 6 of 1974 (Act 6), and Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL). They…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- COM. EX REL. CORBETT v. SnyderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Larson v. Bayer (In re Bayer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Madera v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Madera)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Signature Bank v. BanayanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Harris-Pena v. CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc. (In Re Harris-Pena)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.