Legal Opinion

Kavanaugh v. Brodball

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1894No. 5263PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from the district court of Platte county. Tried below before Post, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

On the 11th day of January, 1889, one Bernard Strottman was indebted to Daniel C. Kavanaugh in the sum of $300 and some interest, and to secure the payment of such indebtedness on said date he executed and delivered to Kavanaugh a chattel mortgage upon some hogs, the property in controversy in this suit. On December 7, 1889, Mr. Strottman became indebted to Ottis Brothers, as an evidence of which he executed to them his note and a chattel mortgage to secure the same upon the same property mortgaged to Kavanaugh. These notes and mortgage were assigned by Ottis Brothers to one Edward…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodman v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Bardwell v. StubbertNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Gamble v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Loyal's Auto Exchange, Inc. v. MunchNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Arcadia State Bank v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Garber v. Palmer, Blanchard & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Ketcham v. George R. Barse Live Stock Commission Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  5. Lucas v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API