Legal Opinion

Bardwell v. Stubbert

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Antelope county. Tried, below before Tiffany, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

In June, 1881, the defendant in error commenced an action in replevin in the district court of Antelope county against James A. Bardwell to recover the possession of six head of cattle. The return on the summons is as follows: “I served the within summons on the within named defendant, James. A. Bardwell by delivering to H. W. Bardwell, his agent,, a certified copy of this summons with all the endorsements thereon.” And on the order of replevin, after stating the taking and delivery of the property to Stubbert, ia the further certificate that, “ I also on said day delivered to H. W. Bardwell,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Goodman v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Perkins v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Berrien v. WesterveltNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  5. Stacy v. FarnhamNew York Supreme Court · 1845

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cockrell v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Krebs Hop Co. v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kavanaugh v. BrodballNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Commercial State Bank v. KetchamNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Bolin v. FinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API