Gamble v. Wilson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Buffalo county. Tried below before Church, J. cited, as to the effect of the transfer: Jones, Chat. Mortgages, sec. 503; Ramsdell v. Tewksbury, 73 Me., 197; Crain v. Pain, 4 Cush. [Mass.], 483. As to measure of damages : Kerr v. Drew, 90 Mo., 147, and cases; Booth v. Ableman, 20 Wis., '21; Seaman v. Luce, 23 Barb. [N. Y.], 240; MoNorton v. Akers, 24 la., 370. cited: Mundy v. Whittemore, 15 Neb., 649.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
One E. Morningstar, who was conducting a banking business under the name of the Farmers & Merchants Bank, at Sartoria, in Buffalo county, borrowed of A. T. Gamble, plaintiff in error, the sum of $1,700 on the 17th day of December, 1887, and executed and delivered his promissory note for that amount, and secured the same by a bill of sale in writing of the property in controversy, consisting of a frame bank building, lumber office, fire and burglar proof safe, bank counter and fixtures. At some date between the 11th and 13th days of March, 1888, Morningstar disappeared, leaving one Taggart in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mundy v. WhittemoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Kersenbrock v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kavanaugh v. BrodballNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Quinlan v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1921