State v. Alston

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The defendants jointly contend that the trial court erred in four respects and defendant Alston contends that he was prejudiced by five other rulings. None of these contentions have merit, in our opinion, and several of them require no discussion, though all have been considered. First we discuss two of the joint contentions.

Their first contention is that the court erred in allowing the State to introduce a document to show that defendant Alston *542owned the car allegedly used in the bank robbery, the contents of which had been suppressed by a prior order. Early in the trial,…