Legal Opinion

United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 11, 1926No. 3PublishedCited by 204 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

Pursuant to an appropriation for the improvement of the Rouge River, Michigan, made in the Rivers and Har bors Act of August 8, 1917, 1 the United States filed in the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan five petitions for the condemnation of numerous parcels of riparian land needed for such improvement, and, also, of a gas main passing underneath the river. 2

The petitions were consolidated, and a jury trial had resulting in seventy-three awards of compensation to the property owners. Judgments were entered confirming all these awards. Writs of error were sued out by the United…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by204 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API