Legal Opinion
In re Polaroid Erisa Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 29, 2006No. 03 Civ. 8335(WHP)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Robert Correia (“Correia”), Bradford Pires (“Pires”) and Otis Powers (“Powers”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action pursuant to the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq., alleging various breaches of fiduciary duty concerning the Polaroid Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”). On March 31, 2005, this Court issued a Memorandum and Order denying Defendants’ motion to dismiss except with respect to Plaintiffs’ claim that Defendants breached their…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Schering Plough Corp. Erisa LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In re Marsh Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Board of Trustees of Aftra Retirement Fund v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Harris v. KoenigDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.