Legal Opinion
Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided September 29, 2008No. 1:02CV00373PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TILLEY, District Judge.
This action arises from a dispute regarding the alleged mismanagement of a retirement plan and is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). This matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Certify Class [Doc. # 118]. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Certify Class [Doc. # 118] is GRANTED.
I
In or about March 1999, RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp. (“RJR Nabisco”), which was the parent company of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (“RJR Tobacco”) and Nabisco Holdings Corp. (“Nabisco Holdings”), decided to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Gariety v. Grant Thornton, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- In re Global Crossing Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Richard Tatum v. RJR Pension Investment CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Boyd v. Coventry Health Care Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- In re Red Hat, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Longo v. Trojan Horse Ltd.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- BEERS v. JOHNSONDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.