Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. County of Butte
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, P. J.
Defendant County of Butte appeals from the judgment of the trial court which held among other things that the formula used by defendant in assessing timberlands of plaintiff Georgia-Pacific Corporation, now Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, was illegal and which directed a new hearing to be conducted by defendant’s Assessment Appeals Board. Plaintiff, in turn, has filed a cross-appeal from that portion of the judgment which directs that a complete rehearing be held on plaintiff’s application for a reduction of the assessment on its timberlands.
Defendant makes multiple…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- BRET HARTE INN, INC v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Mission Housing Development Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Madonna v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Prudential Insurance of America v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.