Prudential Insurance of America v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
This case involves a dispute between respondent Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential) and appellant City and County of San Francisco, as represented by its assessor’s office (the Assessor), over the amount of real property taxes owed on a hotel purchased by Prudential. The central issue is whether a debt at a below-market interest rate which a buyer assumes from a seller must be discounted to its cash equivalent value in determining for purposes of property tax the value of the property sold. We hold that such discounting is required by state law. We also…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Silver v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- BRET HARTE INN, INC v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mission Housing Development Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Farr v. County of NevadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sky River LLC v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. County of LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Norby Lumber Co. v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.