Legal Opinion
BAUMGARDNER Et v. STATE Ex FULTON
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 1934No. 2926PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By GUERNSEY, J.
The following questions are raised by the pleadings, motions, record and error proceeding:
1., Is stockholders’ liability in Ohio a primary or secondary liability?
2. Has the State of Ohio, under the Banking Act, and particularly §§710-75 and 710-96, GC, conferred on or delegated to the Superintendent of Banks, the power and duty of determining the necessity for •and the amount of stockholders’ assessment and if so, is his determiriation of these facts conclusive and final and not.'to be controverted in an action brought to recover stockholders’ liability?
3. When the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Bushnell v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The CamancheSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Bowden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Memphis City v. DeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rainey v. MichelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Ohio v. Union Tr. Co. of Pgh., Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- State of Ohio ex rel. Squire v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ohio Wesleyan Univ. Trustees v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
- Squire v. AbbottOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.