Legal Opinion

State v. Schmeets

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1979No. Crim. 661PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSON, Justice.

The defendant, Ronnie Schmeets [“Schmeets”], has appealed to this court from the judgment of conviction in the Wells County District Court on a charge of possession of a controlled substance. Schmeets was charged with the possession of a controlled substance after police officers discovered cocaine in his apartment during a search that was conducted with a search warrant. Schmeets brought a motion to suppress the evidence obtained during the search of his apartment on the grounds that the search warrant had been improperly executed at night in violation of Rule 41(c) of the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. RingquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. MischeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. RonngrenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. AdkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. HandtmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API