Legal Opinion
State v. Handtmann
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1989No. Cr. 880176, 880215PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Mark Handtmann and Sheila Fuhrman appealed from convictions for drug-related offenses entered upon conditional pleas of guilty under Rule 11(a)(2), N.D.R.Crim.P., after the district court denied their motions to suppress evidence seized during a search of their house pursuant to a search warrant issued by the Morton County Court. We reverse and remand.
The application for the search warrant consisted of the testimony of Detective Dennis Bullinger, the deputy chief of police for the City of Mandan. Bullinger testified that at about 12:35 p.m. on July 17, 1987, he received…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Commonwealth v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- State v. GreggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MischeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. DamronNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RangeloffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.