Legal Opinion

Davis v. Buckham

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1980No. 666 and 725PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

These are two appeals from an order dismissing exceptions to the chancellor’s adjudication and decree nisi. In Appeal No. 666, the appellants are Courtney Davis, Ronald Fogel, Thomas Swartley, Calvin Wolfgang, and Thomas Tolson, individually and trading as the Post Group; the appellee is Rodney Buckham. In Appeal No. 725, Buckham is the appellant, and the Post Group is the appellee. The issue on both appeals is whether the chancellor properly construed and enforced a covenant by Buckham not to compete with the Post Group.

On November 10, 1969, Buckham, Davis, Fogel, and Swartley…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chatham Communications, Inc. v. General Press Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Sidco Paper Company v. AaronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Yuhas v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. In Re the Estate of McKinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. HogeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Pirilla v. BonucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Silo Realty Corp. v. Redevelopment AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Sobers v. Shannon Optical Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Sorokin v. KrasnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API