Legal Opinion

Sorokin v. Krasner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 31, 1981No. 2546PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

This appeal arises from an order of the trial court which affirmed a Decree Nisi, entered a Pinal Decree, and dismissed a complaint in equity. The Plaintiff-Appellants instituted this equity action to compel the imposition of either a constructive trust or a resulting trust on certain property which they had earlier transferred to the Defendant-Appellees, their daughter and son-in-law. The Plaintiff-Appellants, David Sorokin and Rose Sorokin (hereinafter referred to as the “Sorokins”) alleged that prior to the conveyance of the property in issue, the Defendant-Appellees,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. Northeast Dodge Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Fascione v. FascioneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. McDole v. DUQUESNE BREWING CO. OF PITTS.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Davis v. BuckhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Powelson v. PowelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zvonik v. ZvonikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Rusiski v. PribonicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. In Re Estate of BrojackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Buffington v. BuffingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Pirilla v. BonucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API