Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Becker & Morrison

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 13, 1996No. 94-1939; CA A87731PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Husband appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for relief from a default judgment in a dissolution proceeding, on the ground of “surprise.” ORS 19.010(2)(c); ORCP 71 B(1). We reverse and remand.

On November 1, 1994, wife filed, and served on husband, a petition for dissolution of marriage. That petition alleged, as pertinent:

“5.
“The respondent should be required to pay to the petitioner a reasonable sum each month for a reasonable amount of time, as set by the Court, to assist in the maintenance and support of the petitioner.
“7.

“The parties own their residence located at 960…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ConnellOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Cross v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In re the Marriage of McKennaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. In re the Marriage of CaudillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. In re the Marriage of GilbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. In re the Marriage of AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API